<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Becker CPA Review Course</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cpareviewcourse.org/becker-cpa-review-course/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cpareviewcourse.org/becker-cpa-review-course</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:21:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.cpareviewcourse.org/becker-cpa-review-course/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 16:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpareviewcourse.org/?p=14#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Product license lasts 12 months...however, CPA allows 18 months to pass - heaven forbid you don&#039;t get past REG and find yourself with an expired code. 

Becker is in it for the money. 

Questions found in Gleim&#039;s products are ENTIRELY more similar to those found on the actual examinations. 

I wished I could get my money back from Becker - the 2:1 ratio they tout as being the passrate for using their product was clearly produced by a firm they were paying to make such determinations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Product license lasts 12 months&#8230;however, CPA allows 18 months to pass &#8211; heaven forbid you don&#8217;t get past REG and find yourself with an expired code. </p>
<p>Becker is in it for the money. </p>
<p>Questions found in Gleim&#8217;s products are ENTIRELY more similar to those found on the actual examinations. </p>
<p>I wished I could get my money back from Becker &#8211; the 2:1 ratio they tout as being the passrate for using their product was clearly produced by a firm they were paying to make such determinations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.cpareviewcourse.org/becker-cpa-review-course/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpareviewcourse.org/?p=14#comment-24</guid>
		<description>The pass rates for the Uniform CPA Exam would INCLUDE Becker candidates.  

You would need to remove the Becker candidates from the pass rates to validate their claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pass rates for the Uniform CPA Exam would INCLUDE Becker candidates.  </p>
<p>You would need to remove the Becker candidates from the pass rates to validate their claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
